Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leon Brown, Jr.'s avatar

Diana, thank you for the very thoughtful and articulate presentation today. Your analysis was accurate, sensible and compassionate. I don’t know if we will change this insane and draconian state of affairs, but adopting your perspective is undoubtedly key. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Graeme A Rickards's avatar

Thanks Diana. Sadly, this seems to summarise the basic problem illustrated by the aphorism "when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." When violence is the tool of choice, and when it is justified as part of one's identity/destiny, then the bigger hammer the better. Think of the uncountable trillions in wealth syphoned into the coffers of the US, even since WWII. Much of that was invested in its capacity to wage violent war and to metastasise across the globe, infecting countries or eating them out from the inside to leave only a fragile shell which disguises US interests. The aggression also caused non-conforming nations to 'weapon-up' as a deterrent to predation by the empire. Empires are rarely benevolent. They proceed and enlarge by might until they eventually reach some limit which is difficult to foresee. They weaken internally and become more vulnerable to corruption and decay. It's there now for anyone who wants to look. The problem we have today in a close-coupled globalised context, where all manner of WMD have proliferated, is that imperial conflict can no longer be a self-limiting clash or a contained demise. The unipolar US hegemon is fighting for its survival on multiple fronts. This will further impoverish the US populace while forcing its instruments of expressed power to act in more desperate ways (potentially adding to internal tensions - ref Blinken versus Pentagon). Pressurising the populace is a risk which can cut either way, and which will test the multi-generational indoctrination programs. The citizenry might be encouraged to blame others for their conditions and rally in support of the theatrical narrative of a venerable nation fighting external enemies. Or the citizenry might rise in revolt against the enemy within the gates. Or it might revisit the old wounds of civil war and racial conflict. Violent conflict has always been engineered by deception, false flags, covert infiltration, lurking threats. We are vulnerable to being deceived, even by our own investment in narrative and identity. If we can break free of that limited self-understanding, we will reframe conflict in the way you describe. May it happen before it's too late.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts